Record of Portfolio Interview/Assessment

Faculty name:   

Faculty e-mail address:   

Student name:   

Student e-mail address:   

Duration of interview (minutes):   



Grade Assigned:   



Date of this Interview--Portfolio Assessment



Grade

Points
A    Exemplary  
90-100% 19-21
B    Very Good   80-89% 17-18
C    Needs Improvement  70-79% 15-16
D   Unacceptable, Failure 60-69% 13-14
F    Unacceptable, Failure
<13


Category
3
2
1
Content
Good examples of coursework, lessons,  related field experiences and interests. Excellent resume and teaching philosophy. All INTASC standards show reflective activity. Some examples of coursework, lessons, related field experiences,  hobbies and interests.  Acceptable resume and teaching philosophy. Most INTASC standards show reflective activity. Too few examples of coursework, lessons, related field experience, and interests. No/little resume or teaching philosophy.  Few INTASC standards show reflective activity.



Selection of
Artifacts
All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of each INTASC standard. Most artifacts and samples are related to each purpose of the INTASC standard. Few, if any, artifacts and samples are related to the purpose of the INTASC standard.



Standard
Reflections
Reflections describe why the artifact or sample demonstrates achievement of this particular INTASC standard.
"What is the artifact and why is the artifact filed under this standard?"
Reflections describe why the artifact or sample demonstrates achievement of this particular INTASC standard.
"What is the artifact and why is the artifact filed under this standard?"
Few, if any, reflections describe why the artifact or sample demonstrates achievement of this particular INTASC standard.



Personal Reflections
Excellent evaluation of personal strengths and
weaknesses and understanding of the importance of the standard to one's teaching profession.
"What does this standard mean to you? Why is this standard important?  How does mastering/exhibiting this standard make you a skilled teacher?  What experiences have you had that have influenced your interpretation of this standard? What does the artifact say about your growing competence?
Accurate but somewhat superficial consideration of personal strengths and weaknesses and reflection on the importance of the standard to one's teaching profession. Lackluster interest in own work. Just getting it done. Little or not reflection on personal strengths and weaknesses. Little or no reflection on the importance of the standard to one's teaching profession.



Writing Mechanics
The text has no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. The text has a few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. These require minor editing and revision. The text has errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring editing and revision.  (3 or more errors)



Innovative Use of Technology
Innovative use of photos, sounds, graphics, video, and links to Internet resources are used to create interest and add usefulness to the portfolio. Several photos, sounds, graphics, video, and/or links are used to create interest and add usefulness. No evidence of independent resources:  photos, sounds, graphics, video,  links.




Presentation
Superior presentation, well prepared, knowledgeable. Good eye contact, voice, and body language. Presentation keeps audience attention. Some advanced preparation is evident. Good eye contact, voice, and body language. Monotonous presentation, appears that little or nothing was prepared. Inadequate eye contact, voice, and/or body language.






Comments