| MSU STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROPOSAL FOR INSTITUTIONAL PRIORITIES | |||||||
| PROPOSAL OVERVIEW | |||||||
| Title | Faculty and Staff Engagement Resource Development | Request Date | 2012-11-30 | ||||
| Department | Office of Activities and Engagement | ktanner@montana.edu | |||||
| Requestor | Kathryn Tanner | Phone | 406-994-6902 | ||||
| INSTITUTIONAL BENEFIT | |||||||
| Campuses | Bozeman |
Billings |
Havre |
Great Falls |
FSTS |
Extension |
MAES |
| Cross Depts | |||||||
| TIMEFRAME | |||||||
| Proposed Dates | Start: July 1 2013 | End: | |||||
| PROPOSAL SUMMARY | |||||||
| The MSU Office of Activities & Engagement (OAE) is ideally positioned to support the creation of new engagement initiatives in the form of additional service learning courses. We propose to provide faculty and staff with new and innovative engagement resources and will work with academic and non-academic departments to achieve 100% engagement among faculty by the year 2019. The broader impact and benefits of this proposal will touch students and our community partners in meaningful ways and will start to support our staff to find new opportunities to engage with the on-and off-campus communities. | |||||||
| STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT | |||||||
| This proposal addresses objective E.1 to, “Strategically increase service, outreach and engagement at MSU.” The proposed investment will directly impact MSU’s ability to involve faculty, students and staff in service, outreach and engagement. By building needed capacity and infrastructure over the next 3 years we will support the engagement of more faculty, staff and students into and beyond 2019. | |||||||
| COST AND REQUIREMENTS | |||||||
| Funding Type: | One-Time Only Funding | Base (3-yr Recurring) Funding | |||||
| FY13 | FY14 | FY15 | Base ($) | OTO Startup ($) | FTE; | ||
| Salaries | 12514 | .5 | |||||
| Benefits | 5374 | ||||||
| Materials & Supplies | |||||||
| Travel | 3000 | ||||||
| Contracted Services | 20000 | ||||||
| Capital | |||||||
| Other Operations | 22000 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42888 | 20000 | .5 | |
| Please comment, if necessary, regarding cost and requirements. |
Salary and benefits breakdown:
$17,888
Travel breakdown: (recurring in years 1 and 2) Assessment Working Group members travel to relevant conferences (i.e. the Scholarship of Engagement Conference) $3000
Contracted Services breakdown: $10,000 for 3 to 4 faculty videos in year one $10,000 for 3 to 4 staff videos in year one or two
Other Operations breakdown: (recurring all 3 years) $12,000 = Faculty Service Scholars Mini-Grants $10,000 = Service Learning Assistant Stipends |
||||||
| PROPOSAL SCOPE | |||||||
| Describe the Proposal | |||||||
|
Proposal Scope The goal set out in the new MSU strategic plan around engagement reads, “Members of the Montana State University community will be leaders, scholars and engaged citizens of their local, national and global communities, working together with community partners to exchange and apply knowledge and resources to improve the human prospect.” Thus the purpose of this proposal is to build the capacity and infrastructure needed for MSU to achieve this strategic goal by the year 2019. The two objectives put forward here are to 1) establish a set of human and financial resources to support faculty and staff in their engagement efforts; 2) develop a comprehensive assessment plan to establish benchmarks and to measure and document impacts of engagement, service and outreach on all parties involved. Beneficiaries of this work will include MSU faculty, students, staff, partnering organizations and their clients in the local, regional, national, and global communities. Proposal outcomes include: 1) The establishment of the following campus-based faculty-staff engagement resources: a. Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program - Dedicated funding in association with the MSU Service Learning Advisory Board to support faculty wishing to incorporate service into a course curricula for the first time. Available by Spring of 2014. b. Service Learning Assistants Program- We will recruit, select and train 10 student assistants who will provide support to faculty members incorporating service into a course curriculum for the first time. Available by Spring of 2014. c. Engagement Training Videos for Faculty - We will develop a set of four 15 to 20 minute training videos to assist faculty on effectively engage their students and themselves. Available by Fall of 2014. d. Engagement Training Videos for Staff- We will develop a set of three 15 to 20 minute training videos to assist staff on how to effectively engage with the on- and off-campus communities. Available by fall of 2014. 2) By the Spring of 2015 we will have developed a set of metrics by which we can measure service, outreach and engagement impacts on students, faculty, staff and community partners (their beneficiaries) involved in extra-curricular or non-academic engagement activities. In addition we will develop a separate set of metrics to measure impacts on all involved in service learning (academic) or co-curricular service, outreach or engagement. Describe the proposal To achieve the targets set out in the MSU Strategic Plan by 2019 we must increase the resources we have available to faculty, students and staff around service, outreach and engagement opportunities. The following are the resources we propose to develop in support of faculty members to engage themselves and/or their students in new ways on campus and/or in the community. Working with the Service Learning Advisory Board (SLAB) the OAE will create and implement a Faculty Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grants Program. Each year we will award up to ten $1,200 mini-grants to faculty members who wish to incorporate service into the curriculum of one or more courses. Service Learning at MSU is described as a teaching method that utilizes student involvement in community service to meet instructional objectives of a course. Students apply information from a class in authentic settings while addressing real needs of a community. One of the challenges faculty members face in attempting to transition a traditional course to course to a service learning course is out of pocket expenses. These mini-grants would be start-up funds for these ventures, and in return for the support, faculty members will host at least two instructional sessions to share their experience and the processes they utilized with their colleagues on campus. The second most commonly cited challenge for faculty wishing to incorporate service into their curriculum is the time consuming nature of the process. In response to this barrier we propose the development of the Service Learning Assistants Program. We will recruit, select and train ten students to act as assistants to faculty members who are incorporating service into a course curriculum for the first time. We anticipate this program will cost $10,000 per year over three years in the form of ten $1,000 stipends to be paid to the Service Learning Assistants who will serve over the course of one academic year. And finally, we propose to create two sets of short (15 to 20 minute) videos, one set with faculty as the audience and the second set geared toward staff. All of these videos will be accessible on the web and will provide ideas and support to both populations to more effectively engage students and/or themselves. For instance, one would be a quick vignette differentiating between the several different forms of community engagement including outreach, service learning, co-curricular service, extra-curricular service, community-based research, community-based work study jobs, and community-based internships. Another video topic might be specific to developing a service learning course with just enough information to perhaps interest a faculty member into learning more. Do all staff members know they could be a club advisor? New and existing clubs are always looking for advisors who have similar interests or passions for the focus of that group and fulfilling that role can be an amazing way for staff to engage with students. These vignettes would be highly informational, yet fun and engaging to watch. The idea is to have these professionally produced, well marketed across campus and readily available for digestion in fewer than 30 minutes. We propose a one- time outlay of $20,000 to develop, film and market these productions. While the ideas listed above will allow us to meet the quantitative targets behind this engagement goal, why are we doing this? What is the impact on faculty, students, staff and community organizations with whom we partner when we choose to engage? In order or gauge these impacts and continually improve our outreach, service and engagement efforts we will develop a set of metrics to measure these outcomes. By enlisting the expertise of faculty, students and community partners we will form a working group to develop a comprehensive assessment plan over the course of the next three years. Three thousand dollars ($3,000) per year to support this effort will be utilized to send one or more of the group members to a conference focusing on assessing engagement outcomes and bring this information back to our campus. |
|||||||
| Describe the broader impacts and benefits of this proposal | |||||||
|
The resources we intend to develop in this proposal will be made available campus-wide and will address the most common challenges our faculty and staff members face in creating opportunities for engagement. This proposal supports faculty members who will expand the number and variety of service learning courses available to our students across the disciplines and engages them in the process of educating their peers to the benefits of this innovative teaching technique. In addition, the new MSU Strategic Plan includes one metric which states that, “By 2019, MSU staff will have increased opportunities for engagement experiences.” Staff members may be uniquely constrained from participation in many of the of the typical engagement activities due to scheduling challenges or perhaps union/contract limitations. This does not mean we cannot assist staff in identifying options that might work for them. Access to information sources and ideas regarding ways to engage that are readily accessible on-line is a strong step in the right direction Finally, if we do not assess the impacts and gauge the value of our contributions then we cannot advance or improve upon our practices. By taking the time to explore existing assessment models, learn about new trends and implement a plan to measure engagement impacts we will be able to share stories of impact and become leaders in engagement. In this way our service does not end when the experience is over, but the narratives of our challenges and successes can potentially influence others to also choose to engage. |
|||||||
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | |||||||
| Implementation Plan | |||||||
|
Pre- Year 1: (2012-2013) Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools:
Year 1: (2013-2014) Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program:
Service Learning Assistants Program:
Engagement Training Videos for Faculty & Engagement Training Videos for Staff:
Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools:
Year 2: (2014-2015) Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program:
Service Learning Assistants Program:
Engagement Training Videos for Faculty & Engagement Training Videos for Staff:
Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools:
Year 3: (2015-2016 ) Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program:
Service Learning Assistants Program:
Engagement Training Videos for Faculty and Engagement Training Videos for Staff:
Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools:
|
|||||||
| Assessment Plan | |||||||
|
Year 1: Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program:
Service Learning Assistants Program:
Engagement Training Videos for Faculty & Engagement Training Videos for Staff:
Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools:
Year 2: Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program:
Service Learning Assistants Program:
Engagement Training Videos for Faculty & Engagement Training Videos for Staff:
Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools:
Year 3: Service Learning Scholars Mini-Grant Program:
Service Learning Assistants Program:
Engagement Training Videos for Faculty & Engagement Training Videos for Staff:
Engagement Assessment Plan/Tools: Have developed a set of assessment guidelines to measure impacts of academic engagement on all participants that is adopted by faculty governing bodies by the end of year 3 |
|||||||
| If assessed objectives are not met in the timeframe outlined what is the plan to sunset this proposal? | |||||||
|
If objectives above are not met we will determine why they were not met, assess the value of making adjustments to the plan and moving forward, or discontinuing the plan or that portion of the plan all together. We will work with stakeholders and senior division leadership to make informed decisions in a timely fashion. |
|||||||
| SIGNATURES | |||||||
| Dean/Director: | Matthew Caires (mcaires@montana.edu ) | ||||||
| Executive/VP: | James Rimpau (rimpau@montana.edu) | ||||||

Bozeman
Billings