When the
physical breaks down, try a little A.S.P.
Albert J. Figone
Abstract: There are a handful of publications
available about the field of applied sport psychology. However, the substantial
amount of information these publications have to offer is likely used by only
1% of individuals in the kinesiology and coaching fields. Coaches neglect
psychological skills training (PST) primarily because they do not understand
how to practice and instruct it. It is likely that psychological factors
influence the fluctuations in day-to-day performance. Thus, the systematic
practice of PST is required to integrate psychological and physical skills.Albert J. Figone.
It isn't that
tough to get a lot of help from Applied Sport Psychology
Over the past 30
years, technology has produced more information on sport science than it had
done in the previous century. In fact, the supply of information appears to be
doubling every five years!
Paralleling this
phenomenal growth has been the proliferation of books, journals, tapes, and
similar outlets for the dissemination of knowledge on the kinesiology/sport
subdisciplines.
In the field of
Applied Sport Psychology (ASP) are such publications as the Journal of Applied
Sport Psychology, the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, and the Sport
Psychologist, which regularly publish information directly related to the
teaching of mental skills designed to improve performance.
The downside on
this astonishing promulgation of knowledge is that it is probably utilized by
no more than one percent of the individuals in the kinesiology and coaching
fields (Figone, 1997).
What accounts for
the neglect of these massive resources at every level of sport? Consider the
following scenario:
'Jim is batting
.350, yet seems unable to score runners from second or third. He is hitting
just .185 with runners in scoring position. Jim's coach is aware of this breakdown,
but refuses to address the issue. He simply tells Jim, "Just hang
in there; you'll start driving them in."
Many coaches believe
that performance breakdowns can be rectified by increasing the athletes' practice
time—work harder on the shortcomings. They remain perplexed by the fluctuations
in skill execution, and the possibility that success or failure can be produced
by a combination of physical skills (strength, speed, balance, coordination)
and mental skills (concentration, confidence, arousal management).
Since physical
abilities remain relatively stable, it is likely that the psychological factors
account more for the fluctuations in day-to-day performance (Weinberg &
Gould, 1995).
Why do coaches
neglect Psychological Skill Training (PST)?
Basically, because
many coaches do not understand how to teach and practice it. Exhortations
such as 'just relax' or 'concentrate' or 'get
with it mentally' assume that the player already possesses the ability
to concentrate, relax, play confidently, and so on.
Just as basketball
coaches would never try to improve shooting efficiency without thousands of
repetitions in shooting drills, coaches cannot hope to improve their players'
confidence and consistency without systematic practice.
Coaches are not
to be faulted for this state of affairs. Many have not been exposed to or
limited in their exposure to PST. Those who venture into the PST literature
often find themselves intimidated or irritated by the unfamiliar nomenclature
or 'jargon.'
Too much of the
professional literature is composed by experts for other experts (or editorial
boards) rather than for the coaches who have the most need for it.
Despite the fact
that the disseminators of ASP would like to believe that their interventions
are becoming more widely applied, the empirical evidence shows that the
overwhelming majority of coaches are simply not applying PST (Stewart, 1993).
Many coaches harbor
the misconception that champions are born rather than made. They believe that
athletes like Bill Russell, Wayne Gretzky, and Steffi Graff are born with
superior physical and mental skills. While it's true that such skills vary
within any athletical group, almost every champion performer will acknowledge
that he had to spend countless hours honing his physical and psychological
skills.
Bill Russell,
perhaps the greatest defensive player of all time, bristles at the thought that
his superlative ability to physically and mentally intimidate his opponents and
maintain his coolness and concentration despite distractions, were innate.
All of it, he
maintains, was the product of countless hours of integrating his psychological
and physical skills.
Perhaps the coaches'
most frequent reason for not implementing PST is the lack of time. Coaches
will often attribute losing to such non-physical factors as "We
didn't seem ready mentally" or "We couldn't seem to
concentrate" or "We just weren't up for the game"
or "Our opponents just wanted it more."
Upon returning to
practice after such defeats, these coaches will often practice longer on the
physical part of the game, believing that the mental skills responsible for the
loss will take care of themselves.
Fortunately, PST
requires just a fraction of the practice time and, once mastered, can be
practiced by the athlete off the field in their free time.
The
implementation of such skills as goal-setting, imagery, arousal regulation,
concentration, and mental preparation can be effectively taught and applied by
coaches who have the desire to work at it.
REFERENCES
A.J. Figone: Why
Don’t Practitioners Use Research? Explanations and Selected Implications.
A paper presented at the 64th Annual California Association for HPERD, Los
Angeles, 1997
B. Russell &
T. Branch: Second Wind: The Memoirs of an Opinionated Man. New York, Random
House, 1979
C. Stewart:
“Coaching Behavior: The Way You Were, or The Way You Wished You
Were,” Physical Educator, 1993
R.S. Weinberg
& D. Gould: Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Champaign, IL,
Human Kinetics, 1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Coach and Athletic Director, April 1999, pp. 4-6. © 1999 by Scholastic, Inc. Reprinted by permission.