The Montana University System is the third largest employer in the State of
Montana. With approximately 5,560 faculty, staff, and administrators the
University System ranks behind the Montana State Government and the United
States Government with 18,400 and 22,000 employees, respectively
[1].
University System Structure and Funding
A six-member Board of Regents, appointed by the Governor of the State of Montana,
governs the Montana University System. The Board of Regents hires a Commissioner
of Higher Education to whom two university presidents report. The Board of Regents
possesses constitutional autonomy from the State of Montana Legislature.
The State Legislature convenes on a biennial schedule. Though constitutionally
autonomous, the Montana University System remains dependent upon the legislature
to allocate system funding. In addition to state-allocated funding, the
University System receives revenue from external grants and contracts and student
tuition and fees. Funds allocated by the State Legislature have declined
significantly during recent years. In 2000 the University System received $6
million less from the state than they received in 1992. When adjusted for
inflation, the decrease represents a 23 percent reduction.
As state dollars decrease, the University System is increasingly dependent upon
student tuition and fees to maintain the system. In fiscal year 2000 the state
decreased system funding to 49.7 percent of total revenue; student tuition and
fees made up the remaining revenue.
The State Legislature's decisions are based, in part, on Montana's continued
erosion of the tax base due to the state's dependence upon the stagnant wood
products and mining industries. The legislature adamantly opposes increasing
taxes and imposing new taxes.
The most recent legislative session adjourned in April 2001. The lack of
responsiveness to requests to increase higher education funding resulted in the
necessity to increase student tuition from 9 percent to 16 percent, based on
budgetary needs of individual campuses. Most apparent in the recent legislative
session was the demand for increased accountability on the part of the University
System. Increased emphasis on accountability and assessment of outcomes is a
national trend within both academic and non-academic segments of higher education.
Until January 1994, the Montana University System was comprised of six distinct
universities and five colleges of technology. The Montana University System was
then restructured, resulting in two universities, each with three affiliated
campuses, and two separate colleges of technology. Smaller,
affiliated campuses became less autonomous and now rely more heavily on the two
universities for governance oversight, including the area of employee relations.
Concurrent with funding limitations, the Montana University System is experiencing
a growth in student enrollments - an overall increase of approximately 522 students
since 1992. Increasing student enrollment correlates directly to increased
workload for staff.
Bargaining Unit Representation
The State of Montana ranks 19th among all states in percentage of the
work force represented by unions; 17.2 percent of employed workers are represented
by bargaining units in Montana [2].
Fourteen bargaining units represent non-academic staff and seven bargaining
units represent faculty of the Montana University System. There are currently
2,657 non-academic staff members, 2,077 faculty, and 826 administrators employed
by the University System. Bargaining units represent approximately 65 percent of
the work force.
The Montana Public Employees Association (MPEA) represents approximately 1,700
non-academic staff-the largest bargaining unit in the University System. MPEA
membership has increased by 24 percent since 1989. Employees are represented by
MPEA at six of eight University System campuses.
Other unions representing staff include: Teamsters, Local 2; AFSCME, Local 2235;
AFSCME, Local 441; Montana District Council of Laborers; College of Technology
Operating Engineers; Montana Nurses Association; Maintenance Painters; International
Union of Operating Engineers, Local 440; Pacific NW District Council of Carpenters;
United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters; International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers; IAM &; AW; Print, Publishing &; Media Sector of Communication
Workers of America and Graphic Communication International.
Teamsters, Local No. 2 represents 128 staff members. AFSCME, Local No. 2235
membership totals 61; and Laborers represent 133 staff.
Units of the University System encompass a large geographic area, with some units
located at relatively remote distances from others. The greatest distance between
two units is approximately 350 miles. The remoteness of some campuses, combined
with diverse cultures, contributes to difficulty in maintaining ongoing, positive
labor-management relations.
The Director of Labor Relations residing in the Office of the Commissioner of
Higher Education conducts staff collective bargaining centrally. Although
representatives from each campus participate in collective bargaining, issues are
addressed on the basis of system-wide importance and impact.
Further complications occur during the collective bargaining process due to
varied composition of bargaining unit memberships across campus boundaries. For
example, the Laborers union includes only maintenance workers and heavy equipment
operators at the Missoula campus, while only custodians are included in the same
bargaining unit at the Bozeman campus. However, not all custodians at the
Bozeman campus are included in the Laborers bargaining unit; some are represented
by Teamsters and others by MPEA. Custodians at the Missoula and Butte campuses
are included in the MPEA bargaining unit. Members' interests may be very
different among each group of employees. These examples illustrate the unique
challenges of maintaining positive and effective labor relations among campuses
and bargaining units.
Thus, campus-specific concerns and labor relation issues may not be adequately
discussed and resolved during labor negotiations. In some instances, smaller
campuses have no designated individual responsible for labor and employee
relations, creating inconsistencies and confusion. There is no mechanism to
address ongoing labor-management relations in a fair and consistent manner across
all campus boundaries.
Campus Demographics and Work Force
Campuses are diverse in size and missions, and experience varying labor markets.
The following information illustrates some of the differences among campuses:
|
Campus Demographics
|
|
Campus:
|
Student Enrollment
|
Staff
|
Faculty
|
Administrators
|
|
The University of Montana
|
|
Missoula
|
11,412
|
1,083
|
913
|
304
|
|
Montana Tech
|
1,939
|
112
|
209
|
73
|
|
Western
|
1,028
|
69
|
86
|
31
|
|
Helena COT
|
714
|
20
|
47
|
7
|
|
Total UM Campuses:
|
15,093
|
1,284
|
1,255
|
415
|
|
|
|
Montana State University
|
|
Bozeman
|
10,400
|
1,263
|
1,131
|
427
|
|
Billings
|
3,845
|
219
|
221
|
72
|
|
Northern
|
1,395
|
89
|
98
|
67
|
|
Great Falls COT
|
788
|
45
|
63
|
12
|
|
Total MSU Campuses:
|
16,428
|
1,616
|
1,513
|
578
|
|
TOTAL SYSTEM-WIDE:
|
31,521
|
2,900
|
2,768
|
993
|
State Economic Information
Approximately 56 percent of staff members have fewer than 5 years of service with
the University System. The average salary is $24,300. Varied labor markets are
apparent in 2000 annual average unemployment rates detailed by the county in which
each campus resides [3].
|
The University of Montana - Missoula
|
Missoula County
|
3.3%
|
|
MSU--Billings
|
Yellowstone County
|
3.8%
|
|
Great Falls College of Technology
|
Cascade County
|
5.0%
|
|
MSU - Bozeman
|
Gallatin County
|
2.7%
|
|
Helena College of Technology
|
Lewis and Clark
|
4.3%
|
|
Montana Tech of the U of M
|
Silver Bow
|
6.2%
|
|
Western Montana College of U of M
|
Beaverhead
|
4.0%
|
|
MSU-Northern
|
Hill
|
5.0%
|
The State of Montana ranks 30th nationally in per capita income
[4], and has a total available work force of approximately 480,000
[5]. These factors contribute to the overall challenge of the Montana
University System to attract and retain the most qualified staff members.