|
> Teaching & Learning Resources > New Teachers
Legalities
Classroom Legal Issues
Leslie Taylor, MSU Legal Counsel
Montana State University
There are a number of
legal issues that may arise in connection with classroom instruction and
advising. This paper identifies a
few of the more prominent legal issues that an instructor may face in
fulfilling his or her instructional duties.
Privacy of Student
Records
The Family Educational
Rights and Privacy Act [FERPA], a federal law that protects the confidentiality
of a student's educational record, and Montana state statutes, specify that the
university and its faculty may not release information from a student's
educational record to anyone outside of the university without the express
written consent of the student. While a student over the age of 18 is entitled to review his or her
educational record, MSU cannot release information contained in a student's
record to parents, spouses or other family members without an express release
from the student. Education
records covered by federal and state privacy laws includes grades, housing
information, financial status, results of disciplinary proceedings, class
schedules and courses, etc. Faculty may encounter frustrated parents, guardians, or spouses who
question why they cannot have information about a student's grades, financial
obligations, or standing with the University. However, the law prohibits the release without the student's
written permission.
Federal law does allow
release of certain information referred to as "directory
information." This includes
the student's full name, local address and phone number, dates of attendance
and degrees, honors and certificates received, class level (e.g. freshman) and
academic major(s). The University may also release information without the
student's consent in emergency situations if necessary to protect the health or
safety of the student or other individuals.
Students may request the
university not to release directory information by notifying the Registrar's
Office in writing of this request. A student who has requested the Registrar not to release directory
information will be denoted in the electronic records. No information, including directory
information, may be provided to persons outside the university regarding these
students.
Copyright Issues
The U.S. Copyright laws create certain exclusive rights in
authors, artists and performers who create copyrightable works such as books,
articles, plays, performances, etc. However, the same laws carve out an exception for "fair use"
that allows a limited use of copyrighted works under certain
circumstances. It is generally
understood that limited use of copyrighted works in the classroom setting is a
"fair use" that can occur without the copyright holder's
permission. In an effort to give
guidance to classroom instructors, the Association of American Publishers and
the Author's League of America established certain guidelines for the classroom
use of copyrighted materials which are viewed as the minimum standards of
educational fair use. There may be
instances in which copying which does not fall within the guidelines but may
nonetheless be permitted under the criteria of fair use. However, the guidelines are considered
to be a description of a "safe harbor" wherein the use within the
guidelines is conceded as a fair use.
The guidelines allow
multiple copies (one copy per student in a course) for classroom use of short
portions of works (e.g., not more than one short poem, article, story, essay or
two excerpts from the same author). Copying may not be used to create or to replace or substitute for
anthologies, compilations or collective works and shall not substitute for the
purchase of books, publisher's reprints or periodicals and shall not be repeated with respect to the same
item by the same teacher from term to term.
Creating a
"coursepack" with combined materials is an appropriate classroom use,
but it is recommended that coursepacks should be limited to single chapters,
single articles from a journal or other similarly small parts of a work and
should include any copyright notice on the original or appropriate citations
and attributions to the source. If the same materials will be used repeatedly
by the same instructor for the same class, it is generally recommended that
permission to use the materials be obtained from the copyright holder.
Educational institutions
and governmental agencies are also authorized by a separate copyright statute
to publicly display and perform others' works in the course of face-to-face
teaching activities, and to a lesser degree, in digital distance
education. Sections 110 (1) and
(2), Copyright Act. The TEACH Act.
Cheating,
Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct
MSU and its faculty are committed to the highest ethical and
professional standards and behavior in the classroom. The university has adopted a code of conduct for students
that requires academic honesty and integrity and prohibits academic
misconduct. It is important for
instructors to advise students that academic misconduct will not be tolerated
and that the instructor impose university adopted sanctions if academic
misconduct occurs.
Academic misconduct
includes such practices as cheating, plagiarism, tampering or other activities
designed to obtain grades or credit through fraudulent means. If an instructor
has reason to believe that a student has engaged in academic misconduct, the
instructor should personally and privately meet with the student and allow the
student an opportunity to respond to the instructor's concern. If the student is unable to explain his
or her actions and the instructor continues to believe the student engaged in
misconduct, the instructor may impose an academic sanction from oral reprimand
to imposition of failing grade. In
addition to an academic sanction, the instructor may also request that the Dean
of Students file a charge against the student for violation of the Student
Conduct Code which can result in a university sanction such as conduct
probation, suspension or expulsion depending upon the circumstances and the
severity of the academic misconduct.
|