|
Etiology
No evidence is cited.
Epidemiology
No evidence is cited.
Diagnosis
Clinical Diagnosis
The diagnostic accuracy of history,
physical examination and ESR in general practice settings remains
unclear. However, it appears that combining
positive findings increase diagnostic accuracy.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Unknown
-
Type/size: Meta-analysis (36 studies = 11531
patients)
-
Population characteristics: Operated patients;
-
patients with sciatica, bony entrapment, disc
protrusion, low back pain, vertebral cancer
-
Outcome measures: Diagnostic accuracy
-
Citations
Laboratory/X-ray Diagnosis
Neuroanatomic imaging studies (MRI,
CT scan, CT with myelography, myelography and CT discography) capable of
defining lumbar anatomy should not be done during the first month of low
back pain symptoms (with or without sciatica), unless there is progressive
neurologic deficit, or signs and/or symptoms of a serious underlying process,
such as cauda equina syndrome, tumor, or spinal infection
Neuroanatomic imaging should be done one
month after onset of symptoms if:
-
Clinical suspicion of radiculopathy is high
(because of the patient's clinical syndrome of sciatica), and the patient
has been adequately educated about the benefits and risks of surgery, and
the patient prefers to proceed with surgical treatment (if imaging confirms
herniated disc as the cause of his or her pain), or,
-
Imaging is necessary to confirm suspicion
of malignant or infectious disease as the cause of the patient's pain.
-
Consider reviewing case with surgical consultant
or radiologist to aid neuroanatomic imaging selection.
Neuroanatomic imaging should be done 7 weeks
after onset of symptoms if:
-
Sciatica is present and is not improving.
Consider reviewing case with surgical consultant or radiologist to aid
neuroanatomic imaging selection, or,
-
Ordered by neuromuscular consultant to whom
patient has been referred.
Since patients with no back symptoms at all
frequently have abnormal neuroanatomic imaging findings, such imaging for
isolated back pain - without sciatica - should be avoided. The likelihood
of identifying abnormalities unrelated to the patient's illness is excessive.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that surgery for herniated lumbar disc,
in the absence of sciatica, is effective.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Adults
-
Type/size: Meta-analysis
-
Population characteristics: Patients with
acute low back pain or sciatica of less than 3 months duration
-
Outcome measures: Contribution of a neuroanatomic
study to accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and improved outcome
of the patient
-
May not apply to patients whose signs or symptoms
suggest a serious cause of acute low back pain, especially the cauda equina
syndrome
-
Citations
-
Neuroanatomic Imaging in Patients with Acute
Low Back Pain - Reviewed by Group Health Northwest
Treatment
Non-Surgical Treatments
Guidelines for management of uncomplicated
acute low back pain include:
-
Assessment: Carry out diagnostic triage and
consider psychosocial factors.
-
Drug therapy: prescribe analgesics at regular
intervals, not p.r.n.
-
Start with paracetamol (acetaminophen). If
inadequate, substitute with NSAIDs (e.g. ibuprofen or diclofenac) and then
acetaminophen-weak opioid compound (e.g. acetominophen+codeine)
-
Finally consider adding short course of muscle
relaxant such as diazepam or baclofen.
-
Staying active: advise patients to stay as
active as possible, to continue normal daily activities and stay at work;
advise patients to increase their physical activities progressively over
a few days or weeks.
-
Manipulation: Consider manipulative treatment
within the first 6 weeks for patients who need additional help with pain
relief.
-
Back exercises: patients who have not returned
to ordinary activities within 6 weeks should be referred for reactivation/rehabilitation.
-
Do not recommend or use bed rest as a treatment
for simple back pain.
(The actual guideline is worth looking at.)
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Adults
-
Type/size: Meta-analysis
-
Population characteristics: Patients presenting
in primary care with acute or recurrent low back pain, with or without
radiating leg pain of less than 3 months duration
-
Outcome measures: Relief of pain, return to
normal daily activities and work
-
These guidelines are based on a very solid
EBM meta-analysis
-
Citations
Among patients with uncomplicated (no neurological
deficits) acute low-back pain, maintaining ordinary activity as tolerated
and avoiding bed rest led to the most rapid recovery when compared with
bed rest or back-mobilizing exercises.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Adults (mean age 40y)
-
Type/size: RCT of 186 patients
-
Population characteristics: Occupational health
clinic patients with either acute low back pain or an exacerbation of chronic
back pain lasting <3 weeks; 67% female; patients with neurological deficits
excluded
-
Outcome measures: Duration of sick leave,
patient report of the characteristics of the pain, quality of life, functional
assessment, physical examination, patient satisfaction, and cost of care
-
Citations
No treatment has been shown beyond
doubt to be effective in the treatment of non-specific acute and chronic
low back pain. Therapies evaluated and lacking evidence of effectiveness
include physiotherapy, back schools, educational packages, corsets, acupuncture,
osteopathy, chiropractic, spinal manipulations, physical reconditioning,
specific cognitives, behavioural interventions, pain management clinics,
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, facet joint injections of
steroids, epidural injections of steroids, laser therapy, ultrasound, injections
of collagen proliferant substances into spinal soft tissues, family therapies
and antidepressant medication.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Unknown
-
Type/size: Review/meta-analysis (101 studies
= 20307 patients)
-
Population characteristics: Patients with
acute or chronic low back pain
-
Outcome measures: Physical performance, functional
status, pain measures, psychological status, multidimensional health status
profiles
-
Citations
There is insufficient evidence to recommend
group education for the treatment of people with acute or chronic
low back pain.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied:
-
Type/size: Review: (13 studies = 2052 subjects)
-
Population characteristics: People with either
acute or chronic low back pain
-
Outcome measures: Pain intensity, pain duration,
sick leave duration, functional status, knowledge, spinal mobility, number
of pain recurrences, functional status, spinal mobility and number of contacts
with health care providers
-
Only 2 out of 13 interventions were rated
as either good or very good by both expert reviewers
-
The interventions were not sufficiently described
-
Citations
The value of "back school" for treatment
of patients with low back pain has not been convincingly demonstrated.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: 18-61 y
-
Type/size: Meta-analysis (19 studies = 2,373
patients)
-
Population characteristics: Patients with
low back pain; 55% male
-
Outcome measures: pain, disability, spinal
motion, strength/endurance, sick leave, performance level
-
Citations
Treatment of fibromyalgia
with both amitriptyline (25 mg at bedtime) and fluoxetine
(20 mg in the morning) resulted in significant improvement in Fibromyalgia
Impact Scores as well as scores for global well-being, pain and sleep.
The combined regimen was more effective than either drug alone or placebo.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: 18-60y
-
Type/size: RCT of 19 patients
-
Population characteristics: Rheumatologist's
patients who met the classification criteria of the American College of
Rheumatology for fibromyalgia
-
Outcome measures: a manual tender point examination
score, results from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and the Beck’s
Depression Inventory, and a visual analog scale for pain, global well-being,
sleep disturbance, fatigue, and feeling of refreshment upon awakening
-
Small sample size (19 patients)
-
Short follow-up (6 weeks)
-
High drop our rate (nearly one-third of patients
withdrew due to adverse drug effects or worsening symptoms)
-
Citations
Both pharmacologic (non-opioid analgesics,
topical analgesics, NSAIDs, intraarticular corticosteroids, opioid analgesics
and hyaluronan injections) and nonpharmacologic measures (exercise,
occupational therapy, weight loss, self-help groups, joint arthroplasty,
joint replacement, joint lavage) can contribute to the treatment of pain
from osteoarthritis.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Unclear
-
Type/size: Systematic Review of 28 trials
-
Population characteristics: Patients with
arthritis
-
Outcome measures: Pain, swelling, global assessment
-
Citations
Glucosamine (500mg tid) is better than
placebo and as effective as NSAIDs in the treatment of arthritis.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Mean ages 58-75 years
-
Type/size: Systematic Review of 8 randomized
trials
-
Population characteristics: Patients with
arthritis
-
Outcome measures: Lesquesne index, pain, swelling,
global assessment
-
Citations
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
was investigated for the treatment of patients with medically unexplained
physical symptoms. CBT reduced the frequency and intensity of physical
symptoms, impairment of social interactions and sleep, and illness behavior
at 12-month follow-up. The recovery rate was higher with cognitive behavioral
therapy at 6 months but not at 12 months of follow-up.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: 18-64y
-
Type/size: RCT of 79 patients
Population characteristics: General medical
clinic outpatients with unexplained physical symptoms (type of symptoms
unclear), 50% women
Outcome measures: Recovery rate, frequency
and intensity of symptoms, psychological distress, functional impairment,
hypochondriacal beliefs and attitudes, number of visits to the general
practitioner
-
Citations
Surgical Treatment
Surgery is not indicated for herniated
lumbar intervertebral disc during the first month of low back pain symptoms
(with or without sciatica ), unless progressive neurologic impairment,
including cauda equina syndrome, occurs. Surgery is a reasonable option
to treat a patient's herniated lumbar intervertebral disc, if sciatica
is present and symptoms persist longer than one month without improvement.
Since good outcomes are possible without surgery, informed patient choice
should dictate surgical or non-surgical management. Postponing consideration
of surgery an additional 3 weeks is also a reasonable option. Even after
7 weeks of pain due to a herniated disc, non-surgical treatment remains
a reasonable option because very long term (4-10y) outcomes are equivalent.
In the absence of sciatica, there is no evidence that surgery is beneficial.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Adults
-
Type/size: EBM guideline
-
Population characteristics: Patients with
low back pain
-
Outcome measure: Pain relief and improved
function
-
Citations
-
Surgery in Patients with Herniated Lumbar
Disk - Reviewed by Group Health Northwest
Monitoring
No evidence is cited.
Prognosis
Most cases of low back pain seen in primary
care practice have no specific cause. Recovery usually takes more than
just a few weeks, but 90% recover within a year. Nevertheless, 75% have
relapses, usually within 1 year.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Mean age early 40s
-
Type/size: Case series of 269 patients (Not
EBM)
-
Population characteristics: General practitioners'
patients from Amsterdam with both chronic and recent onset low back pain;
50% men
-
Outcome measures: Pain and disability
-
Citations
Prevention
There is limited evidence to recommend
exercise to prevent low back pain in asymptomatic individuals. There
is insufficient
evidence to recommend education (including
"back schools"), mechanical supports (corsets) or risk
factor modification.
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Unknown
-
Type/size: Meta-analysis (64 studies = 731
patients)
-
Population characteristics: asymptomatic patients
with or without prior acute back pain; patients with a history of chronic
back pain were excluded
-
Outcome measures: Prevention of low back pain,
knowledge about back pain, absenteeism from work
-
Citations
Comprehensive educational programs, such as
"back schools," designed to reduce the occurrence of low back injuries
are not effective. The intervention-group had a slightly higher injury
rate than the control group (reporting bias?).
-
Caveats
-
Age group studied: Average age 43y
-
Type/size: RCT of 4000 patients
-
Population characteristics: Postal workers
doing either heavy or light lifting; 75% were male
-
Outcome measure: Initial occurrence of low
back injury, rates of subsequent low back injury, other musculoskeletal
injuries, cost, time off, time until further injury, and safety knowledge
-
Citations
Patient Education
The following patient education materials
are consistent with the available evidence.
Rev. 8/3/99
|