Spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa), diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa), squarrose knapweed (Centaurea virgata), yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitalis) and Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) are closely related noxious weeds that have invaded Montana. These weeds are well adapted to a wide range of habitats including open forests, rangeland, roadsides, CRP lands, pastureland and ditch banks. Russian knapweed can also infest cultivated crop and hay land.
The knapweeds and starthistle threaten long-term productivity of Montana grazing lands and wildlands by reducing biodiversity and increasing soil erosion. These aggressive weeds displace native species, change plant community structure, degrade or eliminate habitat for native animals, reduce forage for livestock and wildlife, and provide food and cover for undesirable non-native animals. The economic impact to agriculture and wildlands from these weeds is substantial. The potential annual loss to Montana's economy from spotted knapweed alone is estimated to be $42 million. If knapweed continues to invade highly vulnerable lands, the potential annual loss to Montana's livestock industry would be $155 million each year.
The purpose of this publication is to provide information about identification, biology and management of knapweeds in Montana and surrounding states. It also provides information necessary for developing and implementing integrated management strategies for these serious invasive weeds.
Spotted knapweed blooms from mid- to late July through early September. Individual flower heads bloom for two to six days before the bracts close. Bracts reopen after about 20 days, and seeds are dispersed by physical movement of the plant. The weed is a prolific seed producer with 1000 or more seeds per plant. Seeds remain viable in soil for more than eight years and are spread easily by water, animals, humans and vehicles.
Spotted knapweed can be identified by the black-tipped bracts on the flower head. Flower color is usually pink to purple but can also be white. (photo by Steve Dewey, Utah State University)
Diffuse knapweed spreads mainly by wind. Mature plants break off at ground level and tumble in the wind or become attached to the undercarriage of vehicles and equipment.
Diffuse knapweed is distinguished from spotted knapweed by spine-tipped bracts on the flower head. Flower color is usually white, but can range from white to light purple. (photo by Steve Dewey, USU)
Squarrose knapweed is distinguished from the other knapweeds by recurved or spreading bracts on the flower head. Flower color is rose or light pink. (photo by Steve Dewey, USU)
The weed causes a neurological disorder in horses called "chewing disease," since affected animals are unable to eat or drink. Affected horses may never recover.
Yellow starthistle has yellow-green spines on the ends of bracts that can be from one-quarter inch to two inches long when the flower is fully open. Flower color is yellow. (photo by Steve Dewey, USU)
Three characteristics distinguish Russian knapweed from the other knapweeds discussed in this publication:
1) Flower head bracts of Russian knapweed have light thin hairs, a papery tip and are green at the base;
2) Russian knapweed spreads by deep, scaly, creeping rhizomes (the dark-colored roots can grow to depths of eight feet the first year and to 23 feet during the second growing season); and
3) Russian knapweed is not a prolific seed producer. Russian knapweed causes the same neurological disease in horses as yellow starthistle. Poisoning by knapweeds and yellow starthistle is generally associated with a lack of good quality forage in infested pastures.
Russian knapweed bracts are egg-shaped, light green at the base, and have a papery tip. Flower color is light purple. (photo by Steve Dewey, USU)
Diffuse knapweed was first recorded in North America in Washington in 1907 and in Mineral County, Montana in 1951. Presently 40 counties have reported diffuse knapweed infestations, totaling about 12,000 acres in the state.
Squarrose knapweed is native to southwest Asia and the Middle East. The weed was first recorded in northern California in 1950 and in Juab County, Utah in 1954. Unofficial records indicate that the weed was present in Utah as early as 1928, where it currently infests an estimated 100,000 acres in five counties. In the Northwest, the weed was first reported in 1988 in Oregon, 1998 in Wyoming, and in 2000 in Judith Basin County, Montana. All known infestations in Montana have been eradicated.
Yellow starthistle is native to dry open habitats in southern Europe. It was first introduced into the United States in Oakland, California in the 1850s as a contaminant of ballast soil or alfalfa seed. Since that time, it has spread to infest from 12 to 20 million acres in California and is a major rangeland weed in Oregon, Washington and Idaho. The weed was first reported in Ravalli County, Montana in 1958. Since that date, yellow starthistle has been reported in Gallatin, Lake, Flathead, Carbon, Sweetgrass and Ravalli Counties. All known infestations in Montana have been eradicated.
Russian knapweed is native to Mongolia, Russian Turkestan, Iran, Turkish Armenia and Asia Minor. Seeds of Russian knapweed were present in alfalfa seed imported from Russian Turkestan beginning in 1898 and 1899. An estimated 500,000 acres were planted with commercial Turkestan alfalfa in the United States. Once imported, it spread widely by sale of domestically produced alfalfa seed or hay containing weed seeds. It was first reported in the Northwest in Yakima County, Washington in 1922 and in Fergus County, Montana in 1934. By 1991, the weed was recorded in every county in Montana and infests an estimated 51,000 acres.
Inventory, monitoring and public education are vital components of an integrated weed management program. However, this publication limits discussion to prevention and control techniques.
Figure 1. Percent control of spotted knapweed two years after treatment (2 YAT) with Banvel, Curtail and Tordon 22K applied at five different application times.
Application timing
Column set 1, furthest left = rosette
Column set 2=bolt
Column set 3=bud
Column set 4=flower
Column set 5=fall
Striped column (left)=Banvel, 1 pt/ac
Light gray middle column=Curtail 2 qts/ac
Dark gray right column=Tordon 22K 1 pt/ac
Table 1. Cost and effectiveness of various treatments for controlling spotted knapweed (Brown et.al. 1999)
1 Costs based on the following information: Hand pulling
? wages $9/hour; mowing - $50/acre; Tordon 22K - $86/gallon; Curtail -
$30.70/gallon; ground application - $20/acre.
2 Data from Rinella et.al., shows an average of 52% control
after mowing in the fall for three consecutive years.
Transline at 0.25 lbs a.i. per acre (2/3 pint) or Curtail at 1.19 lbs a.i. per acre (2 quarts) provide good to excellent spotted knapweed control for one to three years when applied during bolt or bud growth stages. Control with Curtail declines to less than 83 percent when applied at rosette, flower and after-flowering growth stages (Figure 1). Curtail and Transline applied at these rates will remove knapweed from the plant community with limited impact on non-target broadleaf plants. Redeem at 0.56 to 0.75 lbs a.i. per acre (1.5 to 2 pints) provides good control of spotted knapweed.
Banvel applied alone at 1 lb a.i. per acre (1 quart) and 2,4-D at 2 lbs a.i. per acre (2 quarts) provides inconsistent control of the knapweeds. Banvel at 0.5 lbs a.i. per acre (1 pint) in combination with 2,4-D at 1 lb a.i. per acre (1 quart) provides control similar to that of Curtail when applied at the bud growth stage (Figure 1). Applications of 2,4-D alone must be made annually at the rosette to mid-bolt growth stage, until no viable seed remain in the soil.
Biological control will play an important role in the ultimate management of most of the knapweeds. However, as mentioned, biocontrol does have limitations and, therefore, will not be a "cure-all." Successful management of the knapweeds will be a long-term effort involving the combined use of all available control methods and improved land management practices in an integrated approach.
Spotted and diffuse knapweed
Urophora affinis, Fly, Flower head, 1973, Established1
Urophora quadrifasciata ,Fly, Flower head, 1980, Established1
Metzneria paucipunctella, Moth, Flower head, 1980, Established2
Agapeta zoegana, Moth, Root, 1984, Established1
Cyphocleonus achates, Weevil, Root, 1988, Established1
Pterolonche inspersa, Moth, Root, 1988, Not established
Pelochrista medullana, Moth, Root ,1984, Established3
Bangasternus fausti ,Weevil, Flower head, 1992, Not established
Larinus obtusus, Weevil, Flower head, 1992, Established2
Larinus minutus,Weevil, Flower head, 1991, Established2
Terellia virens,Fly, Flower head, 1992, Established3
Chaetorellia acrolophi, Fly, Flower head, 1992, Established3
Sphenoptera jugoslavica, Beetle, Root, 1983, Established2
1 - widely established, or established in moderate numbers at numerous sites
2 - established in moderate numbers at several sites
3 - established in very small numbers
Most of the insects attack both plant species. Status of insects in Montana follows:
Two flower head flies (Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata) were introduced into Montana in 1973 and 1980, respectively, and are now well established in the state. The larvae induce galls in flower heads, which reduces seed production. Seed reductions in excess of 50 percent are occurring in areas where the two fly species coexist.
A flower head moth (Metzneria paucipunctella), released in 1980, is established in small numbers in western Montana. The larvae feed on the florets and seeds of spotted knapweed. Each larva destroys about eight seeds per flower head.
A root moth (Agapeta zoegana) and a root weevil (Cyphocleonus achates), released in 1984 and 1988, respectively, are both established at numerous locations in Montana. Larvae of the moth girdle knapweed roots, while the weevil larvae feed in the center of roots. The two insects are causing measurable reductions in knapweed biomass at several locations. Both insects are being mass-reared at the Western Agricultural Research Center at Corvallis, Montana to hasten their distribution throughout knapweed-infested areas of the state.
A root beetle (Sphenoptera jugoslavica), released in 1983, is established on diffuse knapweed in several areas, especially near East Helena, Montana. The larvae feed in the center of the root. The beetle primarily attacks roots of diffuse knapweed, but will also attack spotted knapweed. The insect appears to be causing reductions in diffuse knapweed biomass in selected areas.
Two flower head weevils (Larinus minutus and L. obtusus) were released in Montana in 1991 and 1992, respectively. Larinus minutus, released against diffuse knapweed, is well established at several locations in Montana, and is causing significant reductions in the biomass and density of that plant near East Helena. Larinus obtusus, released against spotted knapweed, is established but is increasing at a much slower rate than L. minutus. The larvae of both weevils feed on knapweed seeds, and the adults feed on knapweed leaves.
Three insects, a root moth (Pelochrista medullana) released in 1984, and two seed head flies (Chaetorellia acrolophi and Terellia virens) released in 1992, are established on spotted knapweed, but in very small numbers. The life history and behavior of P. medullana is very similar to A. zoegana, but for unknown reasons, P. medullana has had great difficulty establishing in Montana. Similarly, C. acrolophi and T. virens are not establishing nearly as easily as the seed head gall flies (Urophora spp.) In contrast to the Urophora species, the larvae of C. acrolophi and T. virens feed directly on the seeds and do not form galls.
Two insects, a root moth (Pterolonche inspersa) and a flower head weevil (Bangasternus fausti) have failed to establish on spotted knapweed in Montana, following their release in 1988 and 1992, respectively.
Combining herbicides with sheep grazing can also be very effective for controlling some knapweeds. The herbicides can be used to control mature unpalatable plants, and sheep will selectively remove knapweed plants as they re-emerge. As with any strategy, grazing with sheep or goats must be a continuous effort.
Under a short-duration grazing strategy with cattle, spotted knapweed seedlings and rosettes decreased, but bare ground increased and litter decreased. Any procedures that increase bare gound on rangeland are not recommended.
Handpulling is not an effective treatment for Russian knapweed because the plant rapidly resprouts from rhizomes.
In one study, fall mowing of spotted knapweed for three consecutive years reduced adult plant density an average of 73 and 41 percent at two locations. Seedling density may also be reduced by mowing treatments. Another study indicated that spotted knapweed mowed at bolt and late bud stage for two consecutive years did not reduce spotted knapweed cover (Table 1). Mowing at the late bud stage in combination with Curtail at 1 quart per acre provided better control than a similar rate of Curtail applied alone. Mowing prior to a Tordon application did not improve knapweed control compared to the herbicide treatment alone (Table 1).
Revegetation of knapweed-infested rangeland usually involves a spring or early summer application of Tordon 22K, Transline or Curtail followed by a dormant seeding of grass in late fall. If the site can be cultivated, spring treatments with herbicides are not necessary with spotted and diffuse knapweed and yellow starthistle. Both grass and knapweed seedlings will emerge the following spring as long as there is adequate moisture for germination. Knapweed seedlings can be controlled with reduced rates of 2,4-D, Transline, Redeem or Curtail. Selection of species most effective for revegetation of knapweed infested rangeland will depend on site conditions including soil type, moisture, slope and aspect.
In order to make revegetation more cost-effective, a one-pass system can also be used. In this case, Tordon 22K is applied during late fall simultaneously with seeding using a no-till drill. This must be conducted late enough in the fall to ensure no seeds germinate before winter. For spotted knapweed infestations in areas ranging from 13 to 18 inches of annual precipitation in Montana, "Luna" pubescent wheatgrass and bluebunch wheatgrass established well and have kept weeds from reinvading for about six years.
Preventing weed seed spread onto adjacent rangeland is the most cost-effective management strategy. Each of us must reduce or eliminate knapweed and starthistle seed dispersal by:
Bottoms, R.M. and T.D. Whitson. 1998. A systems approach for management of Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Tech. 12:363-366.
Brown, E. 1914. Commercial Turkestan alfalfa seed. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 138.
Brown, Melissa, C.A. Duncan, M.B. Halstvedt. 1999. Spotted knapweed management with integrated methods. Proceedings Western Soc. of Weed Sci. 52: 68-70.
Bucher, R.F. 1984. Potential spread and cost of spotted knapweed on range. Montana State University Extension Service, MontGuide 8423AG.
Chicoine, T.K., P.K. Fay, and G.A. Nielsen. 1988. Weed Science 34:57-61.
Dewey, Steven A., R.W. Mace, L.A. Buhler, and K. Andersen. 2000. The interaction of fire and herbicides in the control of squarrose knapweed. West Soc. Weed Sci. Proc. 53:8.
DiTomaso, J.M., G.B. Kyser, and M.S. Hastings. 1999. Prescribed burning for control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and enhanced native plant diversity. Weed Science 47:233-242.
Fosse, Pat. 1998. Squarrose knapweed demonstration weed management area. National Weed Symposium. April 8-10.
Gerlach, J.D., Jr. 1997. The introduction, dynamics of geographic range expansion, and ecosystem effects of yellow starthistle. Proc. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:136-141.
Groh, H. 1940. Turkestan alfalfa as a medium of weed introduction. Sci. Agric. 20:36-43.
Groh, H. 1944. Canadian weed survey. 2nd Ann. Rep. Can. Dep. Agric. 74 p.
Harris, P. and R. Cranston. 1979. An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada. Can J. Plant Sci. 59: 375-382.
Howell, J.T. 1959. Distributional data on weed thistles in western North America. Leafl. West. Bot. 9:17-32.
Invaders Database, University of Montana.
Kurz, Gregg Louis. 1995. Ecological implications of Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens L.) infestation: Small mammal and habitat associations. M.S. thesis. Dept of Rangeland Ecology, Univ. of Wyoming. p.63.
Hirsch, Steven A and Jay A. Leitch. 1996. The impact of knapweed on Montana's economy. Ag. Econ. Report No. 355. p. 23.
Howell, J.T. 1959. Distributional data on weedy thistles in western North America. Leafl. West. Bot. 9:17-32.
Lacey, J.R., C.B. Marlow, and J.R. Lane. 1989. Influence of spotted knapweed on runoff and sediment yield. Weed Tech. 3:627-631.
Lang, R.F., J.M. Story, and G.L. Piper. 1996. Establishment of Larinus minutus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for biological control of diffuse and spotted knapweed in the western United States. Pan-Pacific Entomologist. 72:209-212.
Lang, R.F., G.L. Piper, and E.M. Coombs. 1998. Establishment and redistribution of Sphenoptera jugoslavica Obenberger (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) for biological control of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa Lamarck) in the midwestern and western United States. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 74:27-31.
Lesica, Peter. 1991. The effect of the introduced weed, Centaurea maculosa on Arabis fecunda , a threatened Montana endemic. Montana Natural Heritage Program, State Library, Helena, Montana.
Maddox, D.M. 1981. Introduction, phenology, and density of yellow starthistle in coastal, intercoastal, and Central Valley situations in California. USDA Agricultural Research Service ARR-W-20.
Panter, Kip E. 1991. Neurotoxicity of the knapweeds (Centaurea spp.) in horses. In: Noxious Range Weeds, ed. Lyn James et.al. Westview Press, Inc. pp. 316-324.
Randall, J.M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Tech. 10(2):370-393.
Rees, N.E., P.C. Quimby, Jr., G.L. Piper, E.M. Coombs, C.E. Turjner, N.R. Spencer, and L.V. Knutson. 1996. Biological control of weeds in the west. Western Society of Weed Science, USDA Agric. Res. Serv., Montana Dept. of Agric., Montana State Univ.
Rice, Peter, M. D. Bendunah, C. Carlson. 1992. Plant community diversity after herbicide control of spotted knapweed. USDA FS Intermountani Res. Sta. Paper INT-460.
Rinella, Matthew J., James S Jacobs, and Roger L. Sheley. In review. Effects of season and frequency of mowing on spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa Lam.). Montana State University.
Roche, Jr., B.F., and C.J. Talbott. 1986. The collection history of Centaurea found in Washington State. Agric. Res. Center Res. Bull. XB0978. Washington State Univ. Coop. Ext., Pullman, WA 36pp.
Roche, B.F., Jr., and C.T. Roche. 1991. Identification, introduction, distribution, ecology, and economics of Centaurea species. Pages 274-291 in L.F. James, J.O. Evans, M.H. Ralphs, and R.D. Child. Eds. Noxious Range Weeds. San Francisco: Westview Press.
Sheley, R., M. Manoukian, and G. Marks. 1996. Preventing noxious weed invasion. Rangelands. 18: 100-101.
Sheley, R. L., and B.F. Roche, Jr. 1982. Rehabilitation of spotted knapweed infested rangeland in northeastern Washington. Abstr. of papers, W. Soc. Weed Sci., Denver, CO.
Sheley, R. L., B.E. Olson, and L.L. Larson. 1997. Effect of weed seed rate and grass defoliation level on diffuse knapweed. J. Range Manage. 50:39-43.
Sheley, Roger L., James S. Jacobs, and Michael F. Carpinelli.1998. Distribution, biology, and management of diffuse (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa). Weed Tech.12:353-362.
Sheley, Roger L., C. A. Duncan, M. B. Halstvedt, and J. S. Jacobs. 1999. Spotted knapweed and grass response to herbicide treatments. J. Range Manage. 53(2):176-182.
Story, J.M., K.W. Boggs, and R.M. Nowierski. 1989. Effect of two introduced seed head flies on spotted knapweed. Montana Ag Research 6(1):14-17.
Story, J.M., W.R. Good, L.J. White, and L. Smith. 2000. Effects of the interaction of the biocontrol agent, Agapeta zoegana L. (Lepidoptera: Cochylidae), and grass competition on spotted knapweed. Biological Control 17:182-190.
Story, J.M., K.W. Boggs, W.R. Good, P. Harris, and R.M. Nowierski. 1991. Metzneria paucipunctella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a moth introduced against spotted knapweed: its feeding strategy and impact on two introduced Urophora spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Can. Entomol. 123:1001-1007.
Thompson, Michael J. 1996. Winter foraging response of elk to spotted knapweed removal. Northwest Sci. Vol.70(1):10-19.
Trunkle, T. and P. Fay. 1991. Transportation of spotted knapweed seeds by vehicles. Proceedings, Montana Weed Control Association Annual Conference. Jan 14-16, Butte, MT. p.33.
Tyser, R.W. and C.H. Key. 1988. Spotted knapweed in natural area fescue
grasslands: An ecological assessment. Northwest Sci. 62:981-987.
Montana State University Extension Service reference to brand or trade
names does not indicate or imply any endorsement of the product or representation
that comparable products may not be available.
Publication of this bulletin was made possible with a grant from the
Noxious Weed Trust Fund, Montana Department of Agriculture.
You are the 12246thperson to access this page.