Publications

(Click year for a pdf version of, or link to, the publication.)

Albarracin, D., Handley, I. M., Noguchi, K., McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Leeper, J., Brown, R. D,

Earl, A., & Hart, W. P. (conditionally accepted). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output:

A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Miller, A. K., Markman, K. D., & Handley, I. M. (2007). Self-blame among sexual assault

victims prospectively predicts re-victimization: A perceived sociolegal context model of

risk. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 129-136.

Lassiter, G. D., Munhall, P. J., Berger, I. P., Weiland, P. E., Handley, I. M., & Geers, A. L.

(2005). Attributional complexity and the camera perspective bias in videotaped

confessions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1).

Handley, I. M., Lassiter, G. D., Nickell, E. F., & Herchenroeder, L. M. (2004). Affect

and automatic mood maintenance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 106-

112.

Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., & McLarney, A. (2003). Discerning the role of optimism

in persuasion: The valence-enhancement hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 85, 554-565.

Lassiter, G. D., Beers, M. J., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Munhall, P. J., & Weiland, P. (2002).

Further evidence of a robust point‑of‑view bias in videotaped confessions.

Current Psychology (thematic issue on jury simulation and eyewitness testimony

studies) 21, 265-288.

Handley, I. M., & Lassiter, G. D. (2002). Mood and information processing: When

happy and sad look the same. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 223-255.

Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Weiland, P. E., & Munhall, P. J. (2002).

Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters

verdicts in simulated trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 867-874.

Lassiter, G. D., Munhall, P. J., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., & Weiland, P. E. (2001). Criminal

confessions on videotape: Does camera perspective bias their perceived veracity? Current

Research in Social Psychology, 7, (1), 1‑10 http://www.uiowa.edu/‑grpproc.

Lassiter, G. D., Munhall, P. J., Geers, A. L., Weiland, P. E., & Handley, I. M. (2001).

Accountability and the camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions. Analyses of

Social Issues and Public Policy, 1, 53‑70.

Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Munhall, P. J., Handley, I. M., & Beers, M. J. (2001) Videotaped

confessions in the courtroom: Guilt is in the eye of the camera. In M. P., Zanna, (Ed),

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 3, pp. 189‑254). New York: Academic Press.

Shelly, R. K., Handley, I. M., Baer, J., & Watson, S. (2001). Groups and affect: Sentiments,

emotions, and performance expectations. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, (10), 135‑150

http://www.uiowa.edu/‑grpproc.