| .
|
.
Dave
is a 50 year-old white male with the following diagnoses:
-
Obesity:
Height 5’10", weight 205 pounds, BMI 30 (minimal risk 18-24)
-
Type
2 diabetes: Fasting blood sugar 150 (desirable
<100). Hgb A1c 8.0 (desirable <6.5)
-
Hypertension:
Blood pressure 150/95 (desirable <130/80)
-
Hyperlipidemia:
Total cholesterol 240 (desirable <200), LDL cholesterol 140 (desirable
<100), HDL cholesterol 30 (desirable >40)
|
.
.
Disease
overview: Dyslipidemia
-
Risks
of dyslipidemia
-
Cardiovascular
disease (CVD): coronary heart disease (CHD), MI, stroke, atherosclerosis
-
In 2003
-
Over 71 million in US with
CVD (34% of adult population - 50% men, 50% women)
-
Over 900,000 deaths/y (47%
men/53% women)
-
Hypercholesterolemia
-
Cholesterol levels
-
<200 – Desirable
-
200-239 – Borderline high
-
>= 240 - High
-
Relationship between elevated
cholesterol and coronary heart disease has been recognized for many years
-
But separating out the individual
roles and importance of cholesterol, each lipoprotein and triglycerides
is difficult because of overlapping abnormalities and effects
-
Hypertriglyceridemia
-
Triglyceride levels
-
<150 – Normal
-
150-199 – Borderline high
-
200-499 – High
-
>=500 – Very high
-
Elevated serum triglycerides
are associated with increased risk for CHD, independent of total cholesterol,
HDL and LDL levels (ATP III)
-
In addition, elevated triglycerides
are commonly associated with other lipid and nonlipid risk factors (ATP
III)
-
High
LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein)
-
LDL levels
-
<100 – Optimal (?<=70)
(very low level of atherogenesis)
-
100-129 – Near optimal/above
optimal (atherogenesis occurs at and above this level)
-
130-159 – Borderline high
-
160-189 – High
-
>=190 – Very high
-
Multiple lines of evidence
from experimental animals, laboratory investigations, epidemiology, genetic
forms of hypercholesterolemia, and controlled clinical trials indicate
a strong causal relationship between elevated LDL cholesterol and CHD (ATP
III)
-
Low
HDL (High Density Lipoprotein)
-
A low HDL-cholesterol level
is strongly and inversely associated with risk for CHD (ATP III)
-
May not reflect effect of
HDL itself, but association with other risk factors
-
Elevated triglycerides
-
Remnant lipoproteins (Intermediate
density lipoproteins = IDL)
-
Small, dense LDL particles
-
Insulin resistance
-
High
VLDL (Very Low Density Lipoprotein) & High IDL (Intermediate Density
Lipoprotein)
-
Not usually measured, but
linked closely to triglyceride levels
-
“Non-HDL cholesterol” (=
total cholesterol – HDL) reflects levels of LDL + intermediate density
lipoproteins (IDL) + VLDL, and may more accurately reflect CHD risk than
LDL alone
-
But
don’t forget the non-lipid-related CVD risk factors
-
Modifiable
-
Hypertension
-
Cigarette smoking
-
Thrombogenic/hemostatic state
-
Diabetes
-
Obesity
-
Physical inactivity
-
Atherogenic diet
-
Non-modifiable
-
Age
-
Male sex
-
Family history of premature
CHD
-
Benefits
of treatment
-
Disease Oriented Evidence/Outcomes
(DOEs)
-
Lower cholesterol levels
-
Lower triglyceride levels
-
Lower LDL levels
-
Elevated HDL levels
-
Patient
Oriented Evidence/Outcomes (POEMs)
-
Lowering total cholesterol
-
Older studies showed lowering
total cholesterol decreased CV events
-
LDL levels were not specifically
identified
-
Lowering triglycerides
-
Appears to lower CVD risk,
but may be related to triglycerides being a marker for other lipid and
nonlipid risk factors
-
Lowering LDL
-
Reduces risk for CHD in primary
and secondary prevention, particularly when LDL-cholesterol levels are
reduced to <130 mg/dL (ATP III)
-
Even lower may be even better:
In patients with stable coronary heart disease, lowering LDL below 80 mg/dL
with high dose atorvastatin decreased cardiovascular events, as compared
to low dose atorvastatin which lowered LDL to ~100 mg/dl (NNT = 45 for
4.9 years, but NNH = 43)
-
Raising HDL
-
Raising HDL by treatment
does not decrease CVD events, CVD mortality or all cause mortality
-
Intensive cholesterol-lowering
therapy may be more effective in preventing coronary events than angioplasty
-
Background/overview references
.
Normal
Lipoprotein Biochemistry and Physiology (See
Figure 1)
.
FIgure
1: Normal Lipoprotein Biochemistry and Physiology
-
Pancreas secretes lipases
into bile to break down fat into fatty acids
-
Liver secretes bile acids
(mostly cholesterol) into bile
-
Intestinal brush border cells
esterify fatty acids into triglycerides and package them with cholesterol
into chylomicrons
-
Chylomicrons are secreted
into lymph system and transported to blood stream, then to capillaries
-
~80% triglycerides/~15% cholesterol
(cholesteryl ester)
-
Capillary lipoprotein lipase
strips off some fatty acids for peripheral cell use
-
Chylomicron remnants transported
to liver via bloodstream
-
Endogenous
pathway
-
Liver creates VLDL to transport
triglycerides and cholesterol to peripheral tissues
-
VLDL
-
Contains ~80% triglycerides/~15%
cholesterol
-
Apoproteins: apo B-100, apo
Cs, apo E
-
Makes up 10-15% of total
serum cholesterol
-
Can directly contribute some
of its cholesterol to HDL for return to liver
-
Emerging understanding of
its role in atherogenesis
-
IDL
-
Contains ~50% triglycerides/~50%
cholesterol
-
Not specifically tested for,
but reflected in total cholesterol lab test result
-
Remnant of VLDL after fatty
acids removed by capillary lipoprotein lipase
-
Returned to liver or converted
into LDL
-
Clinical significance unclear
-
LDL
-
Contains 80+% cholesterol
-
Makes up 60-70% of total
serum cholesterol
-
Apoprotein: apo B-100
-
Taken up by peripheral cells
-
Stored
-
Affects peripheral cell cholesterol
synthesis, which involves HMG Co-A reductase
-
Is the major athrogenic lipoprotein
-
Smaller LDL particles are
more atherogenic
-
Liver and small intestine
create nascent HDL to transport cholesterol from peripheral cell stores
to liver
-
HDL
-
Contains almost 100% cholesterol
-
Makes up 20-30% of total
serum cholesterol
-
Apoproteins: apo A-I and
apo A-II
-
Removes cholesterol from
peripheral cells
-
Also has anti-oxidant and
anti-inflammatory properties
-
May protect against development
of atherosclerosis by removing cholesterol from foam cells, as low HDL
levels associated with higher risk of atherosclerosis
-
References
Rader
DJ and Hobbs HH, Chapter 335, Disorders of Lipoprotein Metabolism, in Kasper
DL et al, Harrison’s Online, www.accessmedicine.com, accessed 2/5/06
(SORT C3)
King
ML, Medical Biochemistry:Lipid Digestion and Lipoproteins, web.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking/lipoproteins.html,
accessed 2/4/06 (SORT C3)
Brunzell
JD and Failor RA. Section 9: Metabolism: II Diagnosis and treatment of
dyslipidemia, in ACP Medicine, www.acpmedicine.com, accessed 2/7/06
(SORT C3)
.
Disordered
Biochemistry and Physiology
-
The inflammatory pathogenesis
of atherosclerosis (See Figure 2)
Figure
2: The Inflammatory Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis
-
Endothelial
activation
-
Stressors (smoking, hypertension,
mechanical stress on vessel walls, hyperglycemia, free fatty acids and
reactive oxygen species (ROxS)) make endothelium “sticky” for activated
leukocytes
-
Activated endothelium also
generates ROxS
-
Leukocyte
activation
-
Lipoproteins (chylomicrons,
VLDL, LDL, VLDL remnants/IDL) activate resting leukocytes in bloodstream
-
Activated leukocytes attach
to activated endothelial cells
-
Attachment causes leukocytes
to release ROxS and tumor necrosis factor-a,
which activate more endothelial cells and damage the endothelial cells
-
Attached monocytes and lymphocytes
squeeze between endothelial cells and enter vessel wall
-
Monocytes are activated and
differentiate into macrophages
-
Invasion
of the lipoproteins
-
LDL and VLDL remnants/IDL
are transported by endothelial cells into the vessel wall
-
LDL is oxidized into highly
atherogenic oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL)
-
Rise
of the foam cells
-
Ox-LDL and remnants are engulfed
by macrophages to form foam cells
-
Foam cells form atheromatous
plaques
-
Foam cells die and leave
their ingested cholesterol and triglycerides as components of the plaque
-
HDL can remove some of this
cholesterol and return it to the liver
-
Inflammation
and recruitment
-
Macrophages also activate
endothelial cells to produce inflammatory chemicals (IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1)
which attract resting leukocytes, which are then activated by lipoproteins,
and the process starts again
-
Aspirin can block the inflammatory
chemical cascade
..
Metabolic
and anatomic consequences
-
Atheroma development and
plaque fracture (See Figure 3)
Figure
3: Atheroma Development and Plaque Fracture
-
Atheromatous plaques grow
on the vessel wall
-
Plumbing problem: Physically
obstruct vessel lumen
-
Thrombosis problem: Damaged
endothelial cells die, fracturing the plaque, exposing thrombogenic chemicals
and stimulating clot formation
.
Therapeutic
approaches (See Figures 1
and 2)
-
Diet
-
Actions:
-
Saturated fat is the principal
dietary determinant of LDL and total cholesterol levels
-
Dietary trans-unsaturated
(partially hydrogenated) fatty acids increase LDL, reduce HDL cholesterol
and are pro-inflammatory
Two 18-carbon fatty acids with a
single double bond
-
Hydrogenation process involves
heating vegetable omega-6 oils to high temperatures, which forms trans-fatty
acids
-
Have replaced animal fats
in most processed foods because of longer shelf life, stability in deep
frying, improved taste
-
trans-FA act physiologically
more like saturated fatty acids
-
Naturally occurring trans-FA
accounts for 0.5% of dietary calories
-
Industrially produced trans-FA
accounts for 2-3% of dietary calories
-
A 2% increase in calories
from trans-FA is associated with a 23% increase in CHD – more than
any other macronutrient
-
Polyunsaturated and monounsaturated
fatty acids actively lower total cholesterol levels
-
Dietary cholesterol can increase
total and LDL cholesterol levels, although to a lesser extent than saturated
fat
-
Hence, dietary modifications
to decrease cholesterol and bad fatty acid intake
-
Examples: Many different
kinds
-
Results:
-
Some diets can lower total
and LDL cholesterol
-
But low-fat diets can increase
plasma triglycerides and decrease HDL
-
Diets high in monounsaturated
fatty acids can lower both total cholesterol and triglycerides
-
Advantages:
-
Some evidence suggests the
Mediterranean diet decreases CV events, possibly due to fiber, olive oil,
n-3 fatty acids
-
May offer other advantages
(e.g. lowering BP, weight)
-
Mediterranean diet relatively
cheap
-
Disadvantages:
-
In
general, diets do not decrease CV or overall mortality
-
Sometimes difficult to adopt
and maintain a different diet
.
-
Examples: Aerobic-type exercise
-
Results:
-
Exercise can raise HDL cholesterol
and lower total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides
-
Advantages:
-
Primary
prevention: Probably decreases CV events and death
-
Secondary
prevention: Probably decreases CV events and death, especially as part
of a multi-factorial intervention program
-
Other benefits (e.g. lowering
BP, weight)
.
-
Statins/HMG
Co-A reductase inhibitors (Stat)
-
Actions:
-
Inhibit rate limiting step
in cholesterol synthesis
-
Increase LDL receptor activity,
thus increased LDL clearance from blood
-
Thus, decrease amount of
peripheral cholesterol presented to liver for recycling into VLDL and ultimately
LDL
-
But also decrease mevalonic
acid production of non-steroidal isoprenoid compounds which are involved
with cell membrane signaling, possibly accounting for non-lipid-related
effects
-
Pleiotropic
effects may be more important than lipid effects
-
Improve endothelial function
-
Reduce inflammation (e.g.
reduce CRP levels)
-
Stabilize plaques
-
Decrease platelet aggregation
-
Decrease thrombin formation
-
Examples: Atorvastatin (Lipitor),
lovastatin (Mevacor, generic), pravastatin (Pravachol), simvastatin
(Zocor)
-
Modestly raise HDL and lower
triglycerides
-
May reverse or slow progression
of atherosclerosis
-
Advantages:
-
Decrease
CV events in patients at all risk levels
-
All seem effective
-
Primary prevention NNT 855
for 1 year (mortality) and 228 for 3.3 years (CV events)
-
However, a newer meta-analysis
on primary prevention suggests a decrease in CV events and revascularizations,
but no decrease in CHD mortality or overall mortality
-
Secondary prevention NNT
248 for one year (mortality) and 50 for 4.4 years (CV events)
-
? Atorvistatin and simvistatin
most effective
-
Atorvastatin shown to be
effective for primary prevention of CV events, but not all-cause mortality
or need for coronary revascularization, in type 2 diabetics (NNT 32 for
3.9 years)
-
Other benefits
-
Prevents stroke (NNT 617-2778
for 1 year), but not as impressively as other CV events
-
Improves acute morbidity
and mortality in MI
-
Possibly reduces risk of
colon and prostate cancer, osteoporosis, Alzheimer’s disease
-
Disadvantages:
-
Usually well tolerated, but
side effects include GI, headache, rash, fatigue, muscle aches/weakness/injury,
hepatic injury
-
But pre-existing LFT elevations
do not increase risk of taking statins, even over 10 times upper limit
of normal
-
Adverse effects with rosuvastatin
(Crestor) are 2-10 times more common than with other statins
-
References
Alsheikh-Ali
AA et al. The safety of rosuvastatin as used in common clinical practice:
a postmarketing analysis. Circulation. 2005 Jun 14;111(23):3051-7. Epub
2005 May 23. PMID: 15911706 (SORT C2)
Baigent
C et al, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy
and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis
of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet.
2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1267-78. PMID: 16214597 (SORT A1)
Briel
M et al. Effects of statins on stroke prevention in patients with and without
coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Am J Med. 2004 Oct 15;117(8):596-606. PMID: 15465509 (SORT A1)
Brugts
JJ et al. The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular
disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised
controlled trials. BMJ. 2009 Jun 30;338:b2376. PMID: 19567909
Chalasani
N et al. Patients with elevated liver enzymes are not at higher risk for
statin hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology. 2004 May;126(5):1287-92. PMID:
15131789 (SORT A2)
Colhoun
HM, CARDS investigators. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with
atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes
Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet.
2004 Aug 21-27;364(9435):685-96. PMID: 15325833 (SORT A1)
Drugs
for Lipids, Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter, 2008 Mar; 6(66):9-16.
(SORT C2)
Farwell
WR et al. The association between statins and cancer incidence in a vetrans
population. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jan 16; 100:134-39. PMID: 18182618
(SORT A2)
Fonarow
GC et al, National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4 Investigators. Effect
of statin use within the first 24 hours of admission for acute myocardial
infarction on early morbidity and mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 1;96(5):611-6.
PMID: 16125480 (SORT A2)
Hiro
T et al. Effect of intensive statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis
in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a multicenter randomized trial
evaluated by volumetric intravascular ultrasound using pitavastatin versus
atorvastatin (JAPAN-ACS [Japan assessment of pitavastatin and atorvastatin
in acute coronary syndrome] study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):293-302.
PMID: 19608026
Kinlay
S. Potential vascular benefits of statins. Am J Med. 2005 Dec;118 Suppl
12A:62-7. PMID: 16356810 (SORT C2)
Liao
JK, Laufs U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol.
2005;45:89-118. PMID: 15822172 (SORT C2)
Mills
EJ et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and events with
statin treatments: a network meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 25;52(22):1769-81. PMID: 19022156
Nissen
SE et al, REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate
lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized
controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Mar 3;291(9):1071-80. PMID: 14996776 (SORT
C1)
Ray
KK et al. Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention:
a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 65,229 participants.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1024-31. PMID: 20585067
Studer
M et al. Effect of different antilipidemic agents and diets on mortality:
a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Apr 11;165(7):725-30. PMID:
15824290 (SORT A1)
Thavendiranathan
P et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy:
a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2006
Nov 27;166(21):2307-13. PMID: 17130382 (SORT A1)
Wilt
TJ et al. Effectiveness of statin therapy in adults with coronary heart
disease. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 12;164(13):1427-36. PMID: 15249352
(SORT A1)
.
-
n-3
Fatty acids/omega-3 Fatty acids (o-3FA)
-
Actions:
-
Are polyunsaturated fatty
acids
-
Reduce hepatic triglyceride
production
-
Increase triglyceride clearance
-
Pleiotropic
effects: Anti-arrhythmic (or maybe not), plaque stabilizing, anti-inflammatory
-
Inflammation partly due to
altered ratio of ingested n-3 (omega-3) and n-6 (omega-6) fatty acids (See
Figure 4)
-
Prehistoric dietary ratio
of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids was about 1:1
-
Modern dietary ratio is about
1:20 or higher
-
Kinetic shift to the production
pro-inflammatory chemicals
Figure
4: Fatty Acids and Inflammation
-
Examples: Fish oil, Omacor
-
Little effect on total cholesterol,
LDL or short-term HDL levels
-
May increase HDL levels long-term
-
Advantages:
-
Decreased
CV morbidity and mortality
-
Secondary prevention NNT
16-44 for 4.4 years
-
Primary prevention ?
-
Benefit may be from pleiotropic
effects, since magnitude of benefit does not correlate with level of lipoprotein
improvement
.
-
Bile
acid sequestrants/Resins (Res)
-
Actions:
-
Bind bile acids in intestine
-
Interrupt enterohepatic circulation
of cholesterol
-
Increase clearance of cholesterol
from blood
-
Examples: Cholestyramine
(Questran, generic), colestipol (Colestid), colesevelam (Welchol)
-
Results:
-
Decreased total and LDL cholesterol
-
May increase triglycerides
-
Advantages:
-
Reduced combined non-fatal
MI and CV mortality (NNT 65 for 7.4 years) in early study
-
Disadvantages:
-
Later studies show
-
Minimal,
if any, reduction in CV mortality
-
No
reduction in cardiac or overall mortality
-
Constipation, heartburn,
nausea, bloating
-
More common with colestipol
and cholestyramine
-
Moderately expensive to expensive
.
-
Fibrate/Fibric
acid derivatives (Fib)
-
Actions:
-
Activate the nuclear transcription
factor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-a
(PPAR-a)
-
Increase expression of lipoprotein
lipase, breaking down triglycerides into free fatty acids in the capillaries
-
Decrease apoC-III, thus decreasing
VLDL
-
Increase expression of apoA-I
and apoA-II, increasing HDL
-
Pleotropic
effects: Anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic
-
Examples: Gemfibrozil (Lopid),
fenofibrate (Tricor, Lofibra, generic)
-
Shift toward production of
larger LDL particles (less atherogenic)
-
Some decreased progression
of atheroma formation
-
Advantages:
-
Decrease
CV events (primary and secondary)
-
Especially in pre-existing
cardiac disease, obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 DM, high triglycerides,
low HDL (CV events NNT = 33 for 4 yrs)
-
Disadvantages:
-
Does
not decrease CV mortality or all-cause mortality
-
Increases
the risk of non-cardiac mortality
-
GI symptoms, cholelithiasis,
hepatitis, myositis
-
Side effects more common
with gemfibrozil
.
Niacin/Nicotinic
acid (Nia)
-
Actions:
-
Decreases VLDL production
-
Increases ApoA1, thus increasing
HDL
-
Decreases lipolysis in adipose
tissue
-
Pleiotropic
effects: Antioxidant (prevents LDL oxidation in endothelium), anti-inflammatory.
-
Examples: Immediate-release
niacin (generic), slow-release (Niaspan, Slo-Niacin)
-
Decreases total cholesterol
-
Decreases LDL, especially
small athrogenic forms
-
Causes regression of atheromas
-
Advantages:
-
Decreases
CV events
-
Secondary prevention studies,
usually with another anti-lipid drug
-
Benefit for primary prevention
unknown
-
Disadvantages:
-
Does
not decrease CV or overall mortality
-
Skin flushing, pruritis
-
Aspirin pre-treatment helps
-
Improves with time
-
Glucose intolerance
-
Especially with high doses
-
Can be safely used in diabetics
with close glucose monitoring
-
GI symptoms, hepatic toxicity,
blurred vision, fatigue
.
-
Cholesterol
absorption inhibitors (CAI)
-
Actions:
-
Blocks absorption of dietary
and biliary cholesterol by intestinal brush border cells
-
Examples: Ezetimibe (Zetia),
ezetimibe+simvastatin (Vytorin)
-
Results:
-
Reduces total and LDL cholesterol
-
Minor effects on triglycerides
and HDL
-
Advantages:
-
Allows lower dose of statin
when combined with a statin
-
? A hammer looking for a
nail
-
Disadvantages:
-
Not
yet shown to improve CV outcomes or mortality
-
Even combined with a statin,
is no better at improving lipoprotein levels than a statin alone
-
Flatulence, diarrhea, myositis,
hepatitis, pancreatitis, thrombocytopenia
|