Defending dissensus: participatory governance and the politics of water measurement in Montana's Yellowstone River Basin
Matthew B Anderson, Damon M Hall, Jamie McEvoy, Susan J Gilbertz, Lucas Ward, Alyson Rode
The role of a particular aspect of collaboration, dissensus, in stimulating critical reconsideration of prior appropriation', a historically hegemonic condition related to water rights in the western United States, is examined via a collaborative planning effort in Montana. Consensual support for a water-use measuring proposal was undermined by strong libertarian resistance to governmental regulation, and an unwavering embrace of the status quo. However, based on insights from scholars engaged in the post-political' dimensions of contemporary forms of rule - dissensus - understood as the manifestation of consensus-forestalling disagreement articulated between oppositional voices - is revealed as a condition to be actively nurtured, rather than purged. This case reveals how dissensus can open discursive spaces for hegemony-disrupting modes of inquiry, alternative perspectives, and innovative possibilities, even among sanctioned participant voices operating within otherwise established, depoliticized governing arenas. The study thus deepens our understanding of the complex political dynamics of participatory water planning.
How is this information collected?
This collection of Montana State authored publications is collected by the Library to highlight the achievements of Montana State researchers and more fully understand the research output of the University. They use a number of resources to pull together as complete a list as possible and understand that there may be publications that are missed. If you note the omission of a current publication or want to know more about the collection and display of this information email Leila Sterman.