Joint Academic Governance Steering Committee
|Babcock, Michael||Chair||Faculty Senate|
|Wilmer, Franke||Member||Faculty Senate|
|Eitle, Tami||Member||Academic Affairs|
|Babbitt, Randy||Member||Past - Chair, Faculty Senate|
|Taylor, Leslie||Member||Legal Council|
|Carucci, Laurence||Member||Faculty Affairs Committee|
|Heard, Julie||Member||Administrative Support - Administration|
|Barkley, Deborah||Member||Academic Human Resources|
The JAGS will conduct preliminary evaluations of proposals and establish a review process or pathway of action for each proposal, which may include:
- Further development of the proposal by a joint working group or the Faculty Affairs Committee. A working group, often the Faculty Affairs Committee, is used when the proposal involves substantial revisions to an existing policy or if the JAGS anticipates significant changes to the submitted proposal.
- Recommend the proposal be sent to Faculty Senate or Deans Council for review and evaluation. This option may include minor editing by the JAGS.
- Recommend the proposal be sent back to the originating body with specific requests for revisions.