Graduate Student Resources

The Committee must consist of at least five (5) faculty members, one being the Doctoral Advisor and one selected by the Graduate School. The remainder will consist of three faculty members. One may be from an outside department. Only one research/adjunct faculty member may serve on the Committee.

Students will write proposals beginning the spring of the 2nd year. These will outline the research plan and be written in cooperation with the advisor. The format must follow that of the current NIH format for R01 applications. An example of a successful application can be found here: Successful NIH R01 application

The qualifying examination must be completed by October 15th in the fall of the 3rd year and must adhere to the following schedule:

1) The proposal will be distributed to the committee 2 weeks prior to an initial meeting. Also due at this time are three abstracts that describe potential topics for the mock proposal.

2) The committee will approve the topic and content of the proposal to ensure it is appropriate. The committee will assign the topic for the mock proposal selected from the three abstracts. Mock proposals should be no more than 7 single-spaced pages, excluding references, and will follow the proposal format. Mock proposals are due to the committee within 2 weeks following topic approval. These proposals are to be written independently.

3) One week following distribution of the mock proposal, students will present a public seminar on their work. This will be followed by an oral examination by the committee on subjects covering both dissertation and mock proposals.

The Graduate Core Committee will determine whether reasons for delay beyond October 15th are acceptable.

Each part of the exam will be evaluated by the committee. Students may pass, fail entirely, or be required to retake one or more components. Repeated examinations must be completed by the end of the fall semester of the 3rd year. 

The Proposal represents the student’s first attempt at explaining what they propose to do over the next years of their training. The proposal is written in cooperation with the Faculty Advisor.

Before the Comprehensive Examination, the primary question that faculty will ask is, “Do you possess the requisite skills, aptitude and knowledge to pursue a Ph.D. research project?” 

After passing the Comprehensive Exam, the question shifts to “What will this student do to address an original question within the realm of the Molecular Biosciences?” For example, a student should be prepared to address the following questions about their Dissertation Project:

• What overriding idea will be tested and what questions will be asked?
• By what methods will these questions be addressed?
• How will the results allow you to answer these questions?
• What do the answers tell you about the overriding idea?
• How will the completion of this research change the way scientists look at this area of biology?

Committees must be formed by the beginning of the 2nd Fall semester. This must be documented by submitting a signed and completed Program of Study with the Department and the Division of Graduate Education by Sept. 20th of the 2nd Fall semester.

Committee meetings must be held annually. Students must prepare a 1-2 page progress report and provide copies to the Graduate Core Committee. These reports will be kept on file to provide record progress and any significant changes that may affect typical progression. The Progress Report must be returned to the Graduate Coordinator.

At the annual meeting, the committee will assess whether research is nearing conclusion and a defense can be scheduled. The Defense Approval form must be submitted to the Graduate Coordinator. Defense dates must be submitted to the Graduate Coordinator and to the Department office.

The above mentioned documents can be found at http://www.montana.edu/gradschool/forms.html

Once the Committee agrees that the candidate has completed enough original research to address some of the questions raised in the Proposal or in subsequent Committee Meetings, the candidate will schedule a Dissertation Defense, which will consist of a public seminar followed immediately by a Committee meeting in which the student must defend the research.

The final Dissertation must be distributed to the Committee Members no less than ten days prior to the scheduled examination. The dissertation must be reviewed and approved by the advisor prior to distribution to the committee.

The following points may be used as guidelines for evaluation:

• Is the research original?
• Are proper experimental designs, techniques and interpretation described in the thesis?
• Is the candidate able to defend their methods, findings and conclusions?
• Is the candidate sufficiently knowledgeable of the literature to place the contribution in context?
• Are the results of the research published or worthy of publication?